The Basic Principles Of metafora
The Basic Principles Of metafora
Blog Article
Las de complemento posicional, o en las que el tenor se encuentra inmediatamente unido al vehículo como en "alegría de primavera", "blanco de nubes" o "brillo de sol".
Analysts team metaphors with other sorts of figurative language, for example antithesis, hyperbole, metonymy, and simile.[3][need quotation to validate] The most typically cited examples of a metaphor in English literature arises from the "All the entire world's a stage" monologue from As You want It:
No suelen ser realistas, y representan de manera creativa y mediante una imagen uncomplicated un concepto más complicado.
“Su boca es una fresa”: El término true es boca, y se está haciendo una comparación entre el color rojo de los labios y el de la fruta.
Although an individual may possibly in fact imagine that Elvis Presley incorporates a hound Pet who transpires being significantly noisy, imagine if his lyric went “You’re similar to a hound Doggy,” or “You’re as whiny to be a hound Doggy.
Fundamento: la similitud entre la forma de una soga con un nudo y la sensación de tener la garganta cerrada (hecha un nudo) por la angustia.
Instructional psychologist Andrew Ortony presents extra express depth: "Metaphors are needed being a communicative unit simply because they allow the transfer of coherent chunks of characteristics -- perceptual, cognitive, emotional and experiential – from the vehicle which is understood to a subject and that is considerably less so.
Aristotle writes in his function the Rhetoric that metaphors make Understanding pleasurable: "To know easily is of course pleasant to all folks, and terms signify a thing, so whichever text produce information in us tend to be the pleasantest."[24] When speaking about Aristotle's Rhetoric, Jan Garret mentioned "metaphor most brings about Studying; for when [Homer] calls previous age "stubble", he generates comprehension and expertise from the genus, considering the fact that both old age and stubble are [species from the genus of] things that have misplaced their bloom.
There is certainly, he implies, a little something divine in metaphor: the world itself is God's poem[52] and metaphor is not just a literary or rhetorical figure but an analytic tool that will penetrate the mysteries of God and His creation.[53]
Un ejemplo de una achievedáfora visionaria es esta estrofa de "Como serpiente" de Vicente Aleixandre, en la que compara a una mujer a una serpiente, aunque no comparten características, salvo la emoción que ambas producen en el poeta:
Las satisfiedáforas son palabras cuya asociación es sugerida o convocada en un texto. Esta asociación deliver relaciones que redimensionan el significado literal de las palabras.
Sus ojos eran luceros; los luceros eran esperanzas; las esperanzas, caballos que llevaban el carro de este amor. (Interpreta la mirada de la persona amada como una luz esperanzadora que sirve de guía en el camino de la vida y del amor)
Primerjalna teorija metafore ima svoje korenine prav tako v antiki, pri Aristotelu, Ciceronu in Kvintilijanu. Podobno kot get more info Aristotel je tudi Ciceron zatrdil, da je metafora velik okras govora. Njegov učenec Kvintilijan je o metafori pisal v osmi knjigi svojega obsežnega dela Institutionis oratoriae in bil prav tako prepričan, da metafora zapolnjuje leksikalno praznino ali pa je v funkciji stilnega okrasa. Metaforo je imel za najlepši trop in dar narave, obenem pa je posvaril, da pogosta raba metafor lahko povzroči nejasnost govora, da je potrebno paziti na ustreznost metafor, da morajo delovati naravno in ne smejo biti vulgarne.
A number of other philosophers have embraced the look at that metaphors could also be called examples of a linguistic "group mistake" which have the likely of main unsuspecting customers into significant obfuscation of assumed within the realm of epistemology. Provided among the them will be the Australian philosopher Colin Murray Turbayne.[38] In his ebook "The parable of Metaphor", Turbayne argues that using metaphor is an essential element in the context of any language procedure which claims to embody richness and depth of knowing.[39] Also, he clarifies the limitations related to a literal interpretation on the mechanistic Cartesian and Newtonian depictions with the universe as minimal over a "device" – a concept which carries on to underlie Substantially of your scientific materialism which prevails in the modern Western globe.